The peer review process for "AI Innovations Review: Advancing Intelligent Technologies Journal" plays a crucial role in maintaining the quality, integrity, and credibility of the published research. The following steps outline the peer review process followed by the journal:

1. Submission: Authors submit their research manuscripts electronically through the journal's online submission system. The manuscripts should adhere to the journal's guidelines and include all necessary components such as abstract, keywords, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.

2. Editorial Review: Upon submission, the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) or Associate Editor (AE) performs an initial review to ensure the manuscript's adherence to the journal's scope, formatting guidelines, and ethical considerations. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be returned to authors without proceeding to the next stage.

3. Peer Review Assignment: If the manuscript passes the initial review, it is assigned to expert reviewers in the relevant field. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, knowledge, and absence of conflicts of interest with the authors. The identities of both authors and reviewers may remain anonymous (double-blind review) to ensure impartiality.

4. Peer Review: Reviewers assess the manuscript's scientific rigor, novelty, methodology, clarity of presentation, and adherence to ethical standards. They provide detailed feedback, suggestions for improvement, and a recommendation regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication. Reviewers may request additional information or revisions from the authors to address any concerns.

5. Reviewer Recommendations: Reviewers submit their recommendations to the EIC or AE, which typically include acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection. The recommendations are based on the reviewers' assessments of the manuscript's quality, originality, significance, and adherence to the journal's standards.

6. Author Revisions: If revisions are requested, authors are notified and given an opportunity to address the reviewers' comments and suggestions. Authors are expected to provide a detailed response to each comment and make appropriate revisions to improve the manuscript.

7. Second Round of Review (if necessary): In some cases, a second round of review may be conducted after the authors submit their revised manuscript. This step ensures that the reviewers' concerns have been adequately addressed and that the manuscript meets the journal's standards.

8. Editorial Decision: The EIC or AE makes a final decision based on the reviewers' recommendations, the authors' revisions, and the overall quality of the manuscript. The decision may include acceptance, conditional acceptance pending minor revisions, request for major revisions, or rejection. The decision is communicated to the authors along with the reviewers' comments and suggestions.

9. Publication: Once the manuscript is accepted, it undergoes the production process, including copyediting, typesetting, and proofreading. The final version is then published in the journal and made available to the public.

The peer review process for "AI Innovations Review: Advancing Intelligent Technologies Journal" follows a rigorous and transparent evaluation process to ensure the publication of high-quality research. By engaging expert reviewers and providing constructive feedback to authors, the journal strives to contribute to the advancement of intelligent technologies and foster innovation in the field.